Perfection.
The trick is to aim for it AND to know that actually attaining it is impossible. :)
John Wooden and Tal Ben-Shahar articulate this process well.
First, Wooden. In Wooden (see Notes), he tells us: “Perfection is what you are striving for, but perfection is an impossibility. However, striving for perfection is not an impossibility. Do the best you can under the conditions that exist. That is what counts.”
Got it.
Now, Tal Ben-Shahar. In his GREAT book The Pursuit of Perfect (see Notes and if you’re a perfectionist and haven’t read it yet, PLEASE do! :), Tal differentiates between a traditional “perfectionist” and an “optimalist.”
The key difference, essentially, is that the optimalist deals with the reality that they’ll NEVER be perfect. They see that their ideals are much more like guiding stars than distant shores.
I can personally never get enough of this wisdom, so let’s check it out one more time: “Psychologists today differentiate between positive perfectionism, which is adaptive and healthy, and negative perfectionism, which is maladaptive and neurotic. I regard these two types of perfectionism as so dramatically different in both their underlying nature and their ramifications that I prefer to use entirely different terms to refer to them. Throughout this book, I will refer to negative perfectionism simply as perfectionism and to positive perfectionism as optimalism.”
Plus: “Perfectionism and optimalism are not distinct ways of being, an either- or choice, but rather they coexist in each person. And while we can move from perfectionism toward optimalism, we never fully leave perfectionism behind and never fully reach optimalism ahead. The optimalism ideal is not a distant shore to be reached but a distant star that guides us and can never be reached. As Carl Rogers pointed out, ‘The good life is a process, not a state of being. It is a direction, not a destination.’”
So, here’s to rockin’ our optimalism and remembering that the good life is a DIRECTION, not a destination! :)